Through the ages, whenever a discussion on the documentation of the French Revolution in classical literature ensues, “A Tale of Two Cities” comes to mind. It shows in grim, deterministic detail the foremost cause for the original revolution, i.e. the victimisation of the peasants by the aristocracy and the famine and suffering faced by them, which subsequently resulted in an uprising and the downfall of the nobility. However, it speaks more of the anarchy that was an outcome of public “awakening”, as the avenging revolutionaries grew to be as depraved as those whom they overthrew. The Revolution and the following reign of terror was an event that gripped the imagination with its atmosphere of suspicion and conspiracy, class antagonisms, its lurid prison massacres and death cart tumbrels. The movie brings home the horror and lawlessness of it in every living room even today.
The plot also reveals the conflicting emotions in the mind of the author. From the perspective of an Englishman, the French Revolution is portrayed as barbaric and fuelled by bitter revenge, rather than by an innate need for freedom of body and spirit. He shows the utter irrationality of the Jacquerie, particularly Madame Defarge, who will stop at nothing, including the murder of innocents, in order to exact their revenge. In contrast, London is made out to be a haven of peace and stability. At the same time, he appears to sympathise with the abject poverty and class injustice prevalent, with an insurgency arising out of the soil of oppression and growing in an environs in which cause and effect knit together irrevocably like the names in Madame Defarge’s “register”. The scene of the wine spilling in the street is especially poignant. The eagerness with which the impoverished peasants lap up the muddy wine shows the extent of the hunger and scarcity faced by them. The wine is also symbolic of the blood that will be spilt in future years by the same peasants in their revolution against the tyranny of the aristocracy. The attitude of the Marquis St. Evremonde when a child is crushed under the wheels of his recklessly driven carriage clearly demonstrates the callousness of an arrogant and indifferent ruling class and their disdain for the life of the lower classes and for their suffering. The subsequent murder of the Marquis foreshadows the coming revolution and is a veiled warning to other members of the nobility of what the future might hold if they persist with meting out inhuman treatment to the bourgeoisie.
The movie awakens in the viewer questions about whether the Revolution was indeed a time of equality, fraternity, and liberty, or a ruthless reign of terror where, consumed by revolutionary fanaticism, the populace who first demanded equal rights for all citizens turn into perpetrators of the very ruthlessness from which they hoped to free themselves by spilling the blood of many innocents.
The plot also reveals the conflicting emotions in the mind of the author. From the perspective of an Englishman, the French Revolution is portrayed as barbaric and fuelled by bitter revenge, rather than by an innate need for freedom of body and spirit. He shows the utter irrationality of the Jacquerie, particularly Madame Defarge, who will stop at nothing, including the murder of innocents, in order to exact their revenge. In contrast, London is made out to be a haven of peace and stability. At the same time, he appears to sympathise with the abject poverty and class injustice prevalent, with an insurgency arising out of the soil of oppression and growing in an environs in which cause and effect knit together irrevocably like the names in Madame Defarge’s “register”. The scene of the wine spilling in the street is especially poignant. The eagerness with which the impoverished peasants lap up the muddy wine shows the extent of the hunger and scarcity faced by them. The wine is also symbolic of the blood that will be spilt in future years by the same peasants in their revolution against the tyranny of the aristocracy. The attitude of the Marquis St. Evremonde when a child is crushed under the wheels of his recklessly driven carriage clearly demonstrates the callousness of an arrogant and indifferent ruling class and their disdain for the life of the lower classes and for their suffering. The subsequent murder of the Marquis foreshadows the coming revolution and is a veiled warning to other members of the nobility of what the future might hold if they persist with meting out inhuman treatment to the bourgeoisie.
The movie awakens in the viewer questions about whether the Revolution was indeed a time of equality, fraternity, and liberty, or a ruthless reign of terror where, consumed by revolutionary fanaticism, the populace who first demanded equal rights for all citizens turn into perpetrators of the very ruthlessness from which they hoped to free themselves by spilling the blood of many innocents.


